Lunar Monoliths
Former AATIP directory Lue Elizondo claimed that there are soon-to-be-released photographs of monolithic structures on the surface of the moon. UAP whistleblower Matthew Brown published an article listing the crimes committed by the Legacy Program and discussed recent rumors of an amnesty offer for members of the program. And last, but not least, the fourth batch of government UFO files dropped, leading Disclosure Foundation executive director Jordan Flowers to state it proves claims of a successful ODNI operation to summon UAP.
Lunar Monoliths
- Former Director of AATIP Lue Elizondo in an interview on the Japanese Niconico News channel: “There’s also photographs, that I don’t believe have been made public yet, that show, on the lunar surface, what appear to be large monolithic structures with right-angle cuts… And I believe those photographs, if they have not been released yet, may be released soon… They are certainly very intriguing, looking at these objects from space.”
- Former NASA Administrator Mike Gold, asked by journalist Ross Coulthart if the Disclosure Foundations NASA investigation team he’s joined will look into lunar anomalies: “Certainly happy to take a look. If you look at the team we’ve assembled… it’s comprised of Dr Maaneli [“Max”] Derakhshani, who has done wonderful work, wonderful episodes with you…”
- Coulthart: “Let’s go through that. So, Max has raiders a huge number of incredibly interesting anomalies, including the possibility of rectilinear artificial structures on the surface of the moon, and even vehicle tracks that aren’t explained by any previous lunar missions. Will you be investigating those?”
- Gold: “We will absolutely be looking at them, and it’s why Max is part of this effort. He has done so much fantastic work to point out these anomalies… Asking the question and trying to point out to NASA, Congress, the FBI, anyone who’s interested, that these are anomalies. What are these? What more study can we do?”
Whistleblower Amnesty
- UAP whistleblower Matthew Brown: “Members of Congress, government officials, journalists, and disclosure advocates are publicly discussing whether the Executive Branch should grant some form of amnesty to individuals with classified UAP knowledge in exchange for their cooperation… These proposals avoid the obvious question: amnesty for what? …What, exactly, are the American people being asked to forgive?”
- Brown: “In a debate thus far lacking specifics, let us now add some. The crimes committed under the authority of the Legacy Program include: Subversion of the constitutional rule of law and the implementation of secret laws, secret courts, secret orders, and secret police; Conspiracy to undermine the sovereignty of the United States Government and its peoples; The aiding and abetting of foreign powers; The ratification and implementation of treaties and international agreements without congressional authorization; Violating the sovereignty of Tribal lands and peoples; Creating state-sponsored monopolies and other actions incompatible with a free market; The suppression of free speech; The suppression of free scientific, historical, and public inquiry; The use of intelligence tradecraft to destroy marriages, families, and businesses; Home invasions intended to gaslight and terrify; The use of less-than-lethal weapons, including directed energy weapons, against American citizens; Human experimentation, including behavioral and genetic experimentation; Kidnappings, forced disappearances, and murders;”
- Brown: “This list is not exhaustive and will inevitably grow as additional information comes to light… Given the gravity of these charges, the American people deserve full transparency regarding the precise terms of any proposed amnesty — and a meaningful voice in deciding whether it should be granted.”
- Stanford Immunologist and UAP researcher Garry Nolan: “I don't think everything should be under amnesty. But if you want the dam to break, strategic amnesty of some acts, while not a popular position, can open up a world of understanding. Prosecutors use it very effectively to get the lower level perpetrators to open up to move towards higher levels of accountability. Many things I agree are unforgivable. I also understand deciding where the deciding line should be will be difficult. Some most at risk of extreme accusations will fight any amnesty. Some at extreme risk will push for total amnesty for obviously selfish reasons. The problem will be deciding motives of anyone positioning in any direction. Search for motives. The logic is easy. Understanding motives is not.”
- Brown: “‘Amnesty’ is being used as a catchall for several distinct policy tools necessary to achieve lawful disclosure. But amnesty for past conduct, immunity from prosecution, and release from secrecy obligations are not the same… A pardon does not, by itself, release a witness from classification rules, non-disclosure agreements, contractual restraints, private retaliation, civil liability, professional blacklisting, or institutional persecution. Amnesty may pardon a crime, but it does not automatically free the truth.”
- Brown: “These tools should be properly sequenced. First, release lawful witnesses and whistleblowers from relevant secrecy obligations. Second, grant immunity to those who provide truthful testimony and have not committed serious crimes. Finally, offer conditional amnesty where necessary, to secure the cooperation required to dismantle the unconstitutional system recipients helped sustain.”
UFO Files Batch 4
- The Debrief: “As with previous releases, the new videos leave much to the imagination; in most cases, they show small blurry objects captured with multi-sensor electro-optical targeting capabilities from fighter aircraft or UAVs, and in some cases, imaging systems on board civilian aircraft. In addition to the new imagery, several historical documents from as early as the 1940s were included with the release, the majority of which were previously made available in past releases by various U.S. government agencies.”
- The Debrief: “One series of historical NASA images included with the new release originates from the 1996 STS-80 mission. The entry… ‘NASA-UAP-D030,’ …features photographs obtained by astronauts aboard the Space Shuttle Columbia at the time, which convey a small triangular or cone-shaped object… The most common interpretation of these objects is that they were ice particles outgassed from the spacecraft, whose highly reflective surfaces could produce the optical effects captured from the space shuttle’s cameras, especially in such low-light conditions.”
- The Debrief: “Several other examples… depict objects apparently engaging in flight at high speeds, such as an object appearing in ‘DOW-UAP-PR112, Eastern United States, 2019’ where the observer reportedly described the object in question as exhibiting ‘flight characteristics unlike anything [the observer] had seen in 28 years for the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy.’”
- The Debrief: “The UAP in ‘DOW-UAP-PR116, Atlantic Ocean, 2020’ include descriptions from the observer that note an object with a ‘darker, maroonish color, approximately 12-15 feet in height’ that was ‘travel[ing] with the wind,’ did not ‘maneuver or change direction,’ and appearing similar to a ‘large, somewhat deformed balloon.’”
- CBS News: “One notable file from the Energy Department details an intrusion by an unidentified object into the airspace over a nuclear weapons facility known as Pantex near Amarillo, Texas, in September 2015. The document includes the account of two officers who chased the object as the nuclear facility was placed on lockdown. ‘Although they were unable to catch up to the object, they stopped their vehicle and got out. Once outside, they noted that the object did not make any sound. Furthermore, the [officers] stated that they were unable to identify any type of propulsion system on the object while using binoculars to assess the object,’ the report said. ‘After viewing it for 1-2 minutes, the object then continued north offsite.’”
- The Debrief: “In his statement on Friday, Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said the DOW and its agency partners ‘are actively working on the next release of UAP files,’ which can be expected to appear on the DOW website in the coming weeks.”
- Harvard Astrophysicist Avi Loeb: “There are a number… that look like real objects, but there is not enough information… One objective of the council that I’m leading, that serves as an advisory council to the US government, is to suggest new instruments, new sensors, that would allow us to collect new data in the future that will get to the bottom of it, figure out what the nature of these objects is. Because if these are technological objects, there are two possibilities.”
- Loeb: “Either they were sent by adversarial nations, in which case they are a matter of national security, or this is the biggest discovery ever made in science, that we’re seeing technological artifacts that are of non-human origin. So, in both cases, we have to figure it out. And… the best way to do that is by getting better data… I would say at the moment, there is no conclusive evidence, but the good news is that the best is yet to come. There is classified data that probably is much richer and more convincing. A high-resolution image of one of these objects would be very revealing.”
Successful UFO Luring
- Disclosure Foundation Executive Director Jordan Flowers: “What I think is really interesting is when you combine the… releases… and synthesize that with some of the comments that members of Congress are making about classified briefings that they are receiving, we end up reaching some astounding conclusions, just based on information that’s publicly available.”
- Flowser: “For instance, the December 2025 incursion in the southwestern US over a sensitive military facility, the ODNI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, was conducting a UAP luring operation. That operation was wildly successful. That operation has FLIR video and photographs of orbs that they encountered as part of that operation. That resulted in an FBI 302 interview, as well as a personal statement from a senior intelligence official at the ODNI, and that precipitated a classified briefing to members of Congress like [House Majority Leader] Scalise and [Representatives] Burlison and Burchett. This event was described as incontrovertible proof that there’s a real phenomenon here, and as a core reason why transparency efforts have accelerated over the past few months.”
- Flowers: “What’s really interesting about that is when you synthesize that with Congressman Burlison’s comments made in public and with the information provided, it was an operation that assumes not only that AARO, the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office and the ODNI know that this is a real phenomena, but they already have the technology and methods with a proven track record to lure and attract these things.”
References
- Niconico News: “A Giant Monolith on the Moon”—Interview with Luis Elizondo
- NewsNation: Inside NASA’s UFO Coverup Culture with Mike Gold
- NewsNation: Is NASA blurring their photos, with Maaneli Derakhshani
- Brown: On Amnesty
- Nolan: “Strategic amnesty can open up a world of understanding.”
- war.gov: Fourth tranche of UAP records
- The Debrief: Pentagon Releases New Batch of UAP Videos and Historical Files, But Clarity Remains Elusive
- CBS News: Pentagon releases new batch of UFO files: "Unlike anything I had seen"
- CBS News: Astrophysicist Avi Loeb on Pentagon's 4th UFO files release
- Liberation Times: U.S. Conducted Successful UFO “Luring Operation,” Advocate Claims, as Government Files Detail Orb Encounters
- CBS News: What stands out from latest Pentagon UFO files release, according to Disclosure Foundation director
- Burlison: “I was briefed on an event to summon UAP.”
- NewsNation: Rep. Eric Burlison on UAP material he saw inside SCIF
Episode 91, posted on
- Previous: Coulthart vs Elizondo